From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mark Woodward <markw@mohawksoft.com>
Cc: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Snapshots
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:57:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120216135702.GA6212@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3D03AE.2050502@mohawksoft.com>
On Thu, Feb 16 2012 at 8:25am -0500,
Mark Woodward <markw@mohawksoft.com> wrote:
> I have been looking into LVM2 for a while now and while I think it
> is useful for a range of applications, its seems pretty limited in
> overall scope.
>
> Is there any active development happening? Most of the code seems
> like bug-fixes or minor tweaks. Is the snapshot system being
> improved? Specifically, snapshots of snapshots? thin provisioned
> snapshots or auto-expand (i.e. snapshots don't run out of space).
> If you look at technologies like ZFS snapshots are far better
> supported, but ZFS will probably never be real under Linux, and it
> really is far more than is really needed.
>
> So, I guess my questions are these: Is LVM in maintenance mode or is
> there active development? If it is being actively developed, is
> there a road map and is there a group or site specifically dedicated
> to the development?
Um, where are you even getting this idea that LVM2 is in maintenance
mode? Or that snapshots haven't improved?
Sorry to come off defensive but your entire post is founded on incorrect
understanding.
Anyway, if you look at the change history of the lvm2 repository (be it
cvs or git, cvs commits are mirrored to git) you'll see there have been
regular changes flowing in and most recently a very extensive evolution
of the code to add support for thin provisioning with highly efficient
snapshots (ala btrfs or ZFS).
try: git clone git://sources.redhat.com/git/lvm2
take a look at the WHATS_NEW file and tell me what you think.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-16 13:25 [linux-lvm] Snapshots Mark Woodward
2012-02-16 13:57 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2012-02-16 14:05 ` Marco Pizzoli
2012-02-17 15:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-02-16 14:42 ` Mark Woodward
2012-02-16 15:18 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2012-02-16 15:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-02-17 4:46 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2012-02-17 13:56 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-02-16 16:51 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2012-02-16 15:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-02-16 16:04 ` Mark Woodward
2012-02-16 16:09 ` Mike Snitzer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-17 14:24 Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-17 14:37 ` Peter Keller
2009-09-10 23:25 jonr
2009-09-11 9:14 ` Peter Keller
2009-09-11 13:39 ` André Gillibert
2001-10-18 20:35 [linux-lvm] snapshots Robert Dyas
2001-10-18 21:11 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120216135702.GA6212@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=markw@mohawksoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).