From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Andres Toomsalu <andres@active.ee>
Cc: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM thin LV filesystem superblock corruption
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:45:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130325194511.GA27105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374A7DD-6B0E-4F25-8D2D-4D0AEA62C82B@active.ee>
On Fri, Mar 22 2013 at 11:12am -0400,
Andres Toomsalu <andres@active.ee> wrote:
> Update! Issue seems to be active only with PERC H800 and MD1200 disks - local raid with PERC H700 and lvm thin lv-s work fine without corrupting on reboot.
>
>
> We stumbled on strange lvm thinly provisioned LV filesystem corruption case - here are steps that reproduce the issue:
>
> lvcreate --thinpool pool -L 8T --poolmetadatasize 16G VolGroupL1
> lvcreate -T VolGroupL1/pool -V 2T --name thin_storage
> mkfs.ext4 /dev/VolGroupL1/thin_storage
> mount /dev/VolGroupL1/thin_storage /storage/
> reboot
Couple things:
1) mkfs.ext4 does buffered IO so there is no gaurantee the superblock or
any other block group destriptors, have actually been committed to
non-volatile storage when mkfs.ext4 completes
2) reboot sequence is very distro specific; /storage may not have been
unmounted before reboot -- if it was unmounted then all data
should've been pushed out to non-volatile storage
So if you add this to command before "reboot" do you no longer have
missing data after the system reboots?:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> # NB! without host reboot unmount/mount succeeds!
>
> [root@node3 ~]# mount /dev/VolGroupL1/thin_storage /storage/
> mount: you must specify the filesystem type
>
> Tried also to set poolmetadatasize to 2G, 14G, 15G and pool size to 1T, 2T - no change - corruption still happens.
>
> Hardware setup:
> * Underlaying block device (sdb) is hosted by PERC H800 controller and disks are coming from SAS disk expansion box (DELL MD1200).
...
> What could be the issue here?
I assume by "reboot" you mean the host (with the PERC card) never loses
power?
What layers of hardware writeback caching are in place in the
H800+MD1200 case vs H700+localraid?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-25 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-22 15:12 [linux-lvm] LVM thin LV filesystem superblock corruption Andres Toomsalu
2013-03-25 19:45 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-03-25 21:29 ` Andres Toomsalu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-22 13:50 Andres Toomsalu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130325194511.GA27105@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=andres@active.ee \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).