From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from agk-dp.fab.redhat.com (agk-dp.fab.redhat.com [10.33.0.20]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9OGQRYK008462 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:26:28 -0400 Received: from agk by agk-dp.fab.redhat.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VZNju-0005Fn-Hq for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:26:26 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:26:26 +0100 From: Alasdair G Kergon Message-ID: <20131024162626.GC17070@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> References: <5267FCC6.6060605@tekcomms.com> <5268E9CA.60100@redhat.com> <52693D2E.705@dogpad.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52693D2E.705@dogpad.net> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvs complains of missing PVs that are not missing Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development The system has no idea what happened to the PV while it was missing, so it requires you to take this action to confirm that you've checked what happened and decided it is OK to continue to use the volume after it reappears. Alasdair