From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Thin snapshot caching behaviour
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 02:19:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140604001914.GO12754@soda.linbit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140603152209.GA13815@k2>
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:22:09PM +0000, dw+linux-lvm@hmmz.org wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> While playing with LVM thin provisioning, I've noticed that snapshots
> seem to have different caching semantics compared to their original thin
> LV.
>
> I've hunted everywhere for documentation that describes this difference,
> or even an indication of on what layer it occurs, but I can find none.
> Perhaps someone here could shed some light?
>
> Thin volume behaves like a regular drive:
>
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> # dd if=/dev/vg0/tv0 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1000
> 65536000 bytes (66 MB) copied, 0.946389 s, 69.2 MB/s
>
> # dd if=/dev/vg0/tv0 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1000
> 65536000 bytes (66 MB) copied, 0.00810655 s, 8.1 GB/s
>
> Create activated snapshot:
>
> # lvcreate -kn -s -n tv0s /dev/vg0/tv0
> Logical volume "tv0s" created
>
> # dd if=/dev/vg0/tv0s of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1000
> 65536000 bytes (66 MB) copied, 1.00061 s, 65.5 MB/s
>
> Second dd shows no/very little speedup:
>
> # time dd if=/dev/vg0/tv0s of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1000
> 65536000 bytes (66 MB) copied, 0.921402 s, 71.1 MB/s
# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
# free -m
# exec 77< /dev/vg0/tv0s
# time dd if=/dev/vg0/tv0s of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1000
# free -m
# time dd if=/dev/vg0/tv0s of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1000
# free -m
# exec 77<&-
# free -m
Background:
linux "forgets" the buffer cache for a block device,
if the last opener is gone (no one has it open anymore).
The "main" device has some internal references,
or is mounted... someone has it open, anyways.
At least that's my best guess as to what you are seeing there.
--
: Lars Ellenberg
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-03 15:22 [linux-lvm] Thin snapshot caching behaviour dw+linux-lvm
2014-06-04 0:19 ` Lars Ellenberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140604001914.GO12754@soda.linbit \
--to=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).