From: Christian Hesse <list@eworm.de>
To: Ondrej Kozina <okozina@redhat.com>
Cc: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] autoactivation fails
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 14:05:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150526140534.4b04c406@leda.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55643397.7010609@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1737 bytes --]
Ondrej Kozina <okozina@redhat.com> on Tue, 2015/05/26 10:49:
> On 05/26/2015 10:06 AM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > Christian Hesse <list@eworm.de> on Mon, 2015/05/25 18:36:
> >
> > Actually running v2.02.220 with commit f8bf6410 on top. Volumes are
> > activated, but udev reports:
> >
> > timeout, giving up waiting for workers to finish
> >
> > This adds a boot delay of 30 seconds. Not perfectly sure if this is an
> > lvm2 issue though, chances are that this is caused by systemd v220
> > update. Any ideas?
>
> Could you try to boot with udev in debug mode? I'm not sure if it's same
> as with Fedora distribution. It should be enough to put 'debug' keyword
> among kernel parameters, though I'm not sure about Arch Linux distribution.
>
> Paste udev debug messages here. Look for lines containing pvscan but the
> reason for such timeout may be completely lvm2 unrelated.
>
> Also I'm slightly confused here. Do we speak about system w/o systemd
> involved at all? Or do Arch Linux boot to initramfs w/o systemd and
> switch to systemd after root being actually mounted?
>
> And on last question, do you ship upstream udev rules or do you install
> Arch Linux specific rules?
First of all... It's not related to lvm2.
Even a system without lvm2 hook in initramfs is effected.
Looks like this is an upstream udev issue:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90051
I will not bother you with any details of my system. ;)
Thanks a lot anyway!
--
main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/* Chris get my mail address: */=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/* gcc -o sig sig.c && ./sig */b/42*2-3)*42);}
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 12:19 [linux-lvm] autoactivation fails Christian Hesse
2015-05-21 15:09 ` Ondrej Kozina
2015-05-21 18:57 ` Christian Hesse
2015-05-21 19:50 ` Christian Hesse
2015-05-22 6:44 ` Ondrej Kozina
2015-05-25 7:16 ` Ondrej Kozina
2015-05-25 16:36 ` Christian Hesse
2015-05-26 8:06 ` Christian Hesse
2015-05-26 8:49 ` Ondrej Kozina
2015-05-26 12:05 ` Christian Hesse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150526140534.4b04c406@leda.localdomain \
--to=list@eworm.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=okozina@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).