From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from localhost (vpn1-5-217.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.217]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3PDnjbq007360 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:49:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:49:48 +0100 From: Joe Thornber Message-ID: <20160425134947.GA8148@rh-vpn> References: <4b0d651386c11fdb2808a9f4bb88fc36@dds.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4b0d651386c11fdb2808a9f4bb88fc36@dds.nl> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] is lvmcache really ready? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 04:50:01PM +0000, Xen wrote: > The reason I'm wanting to use it at this point is to speed up > booting (although unimportant) but mostly to make a more snappy > system while running, ie. for instance just application startup. I doubt it'll speed up booting, which occurs infrequently so dm-cache will not have reason to promote those blocks above others. - Joe