From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:55:30 -0500 From: David Teigland Message-ID: <20170911165530.GA2046@redhat.com> References: <76b114ca-404b-d7e5-8f59-26336acaadcf@assyoma.it> <0c6c96790329aec2e75505eaf544bade@assyoma.it> <8fee43a1-dd57-f0a5-c9de-8bf74f16afb0@gmail.com> <7d0d218c420d7c687d1a17342da5ca00@xenhideout.nl> <6e9535b6-218c-3f66-2048-88e1fcd21329@redhat.com> <2cea88d3e483b3db671cc8dd446d66d0@xenhideout.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Reserve space for specific thin logical volumes Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Zdenek Kabelac Cc: list@xenhideout.nl, linux-lvm@redhat.com On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:11:06PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > Aye but does design have to be complete failure when condition runs out? > > YES I am not satisfied with the way thin pools fail when space is exhausted, and we aim to do better. Our goal should be that the system behaves at least no worse than a file system reaching 100% usage on a normal LV.