From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7463DC433DB for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5B92311B for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:46:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BC5B92311B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1609944403; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=qhoOdIhL5x8Q0nI4kc6bWl0MSPIFaeRQZQdkhyXALXo=; b=h616rZ6OleusaMOfpY4O+vCk2M5iJd7wPITxEAh/cEM0A3PRplj3B2cruHT/+oYHI8x6YQ NZwd+4TwCg6tREP/BxgDjwEw9X9bvs99+GXZm43Gd+u4s7FbEXCkyCGVjB3YZ81+ChUeyE qaKM/MzNaWJbVrsGFfZD0kzNzBR4ylU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-179-1UMHm0wBOXuZ7KS7VCBzYg-1; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 09:46:40 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 1UMHm0wBOXuZ7KS7VCBzYg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D66C18B9F1D; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 838905D9E2; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94C34E58E; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 106EkQUh006814 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:46:26 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 65BEC5D9DD; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agk.fab.redhat.com (agk-dp.fab.redhat.com [10.33.15.10]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E39DB5D9D2; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agk by agk.fab.redhat.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1kxA4m-0002Pf-Io; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 14:46:16 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 14:46:16 +0000 From: Alasdair G Kergon To: Phillip Susi Message-ID: <20210106144616.GA9263@agk.fab.redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Phillip Susi , LVM general discussion and development References: <87im8bch2c.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> <20210105204737.GC5546@agk.fab.redhat.com> <87v9cbdqzy.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> <20210106015254.GE5546@agk.fab.redhat.com> <878s965dvw.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878s965dvw.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered in England and Wales, number 03798903. Registered Office: Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE. X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-loop: linux-lvm@redhat.com Cc: LVM general discussion and development Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Mirror allocation policy X-BeenThere: linux-lvm@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-lvm-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:36:39AM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: > Based on the number of extents it said it was looking for, I didn't > think it was the log that it couldn't place. It was looking for what it calls 'parallel' extents i.e. extents not on the same device as the ones belonging to the existing LV being converted, and, at first sight, it wasn't giving you the option of overriding that in respect of the log. Clearly the code could be improved, but it's a very much a niche case, well outside the normal way it's expected to be used. Alasdair _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/