linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: linux-lvm <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove speed
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:12:09 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2118934913.869.1487344329807.JavaMail.zimbra@karlsbakk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58A64774.10004@tlinx.org>

I get 200MB on a cold day and 500 on a nice one from this SAN. These 40-50MB/s seem really being limited by pvmove alone. Nothing else shows this limit. That's why I'm asking.

Vennlig hilsen / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
Da mihi sis bubulae frustrum assae, solana tuberosa in modo Gallico fricta, ac quassum lactatum coagulatum crassum. Quod me nutrit me destruit.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "L A Walsh" <lvm@tlinx.org>
> To: "linux-lvm" <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, 17 February, 2017 01:44:36
> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove speed

> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>>> I'm doing pvmove of some rather large volumes from a Dell Equallogic system to
>>> Dell Compellent. Both are connected on iSCSI ....
> ----
>    I've never had very great speeds over a network.  I've gotten the
> impression
> that iSCSI is slower than some other network protocols.
> 
>    Locally (RAID=>RAID) I got about 400-500MB/s, but the best I've
> gotten, recently, over a 10Gb network card has been about 200MB/s.
> Oddly, when I first got the cards, I was getting up to 400-600MB/s, but
> after MS started pushing
> Win10 and "updates" to Win7 (my communication has been between
> Win7SP1<->linux server), my speed dropped to barely over 100MB/s which
> is about what I got with
> a 1Gb card.  I wasn't able to get any better speeds using *windows*
> single-threaded SMB proto even using 2x10Gb (have a dedicated link tween
> workstation and server) -- but I did notice the cpu maxing out on either the
> windows or the Samba side depending on packet size and who was doing the
> sending.
> 
>    50MB sounds awfully slow, but not out of the ballpark -- I had
> benched a few
> NAS solutions @ home, but could rarely get about 10MB/s (usually
> slower), so gave up on those and went w/a linux server -- but still alot
> slower than I'd
> like (100-200MB/s sustained, but those figures may change w/the next MS
> "update").  But gave up on commercial, out-of-the-box solutions, and the
> 4x1Gb
> connect you have may be costing you more cpu than its worth... Problem I
> noted
> on 2x10G was too many duplicate packets -- so running 1x10Gb now but
> still maxing out around 200MB/s over an unencrypted SMB/CIFS session.
> 
>    I'm not sure it could be an LVM problem given its local speed for
> pvmoves --
> do you have some measurement of faster file I/O throughput using iSCSI
> over your
> connections?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-17 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-11  8:59 [linux-lvm] pvmove speed Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2017-02-16 18:22 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2017-02-17  0:44   ` L A Walsh
2017-02-17  1:24     ` pattonme
2017-02-17 15:12     ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [this message]
2017-02-17 17:01       ` John Stoffel
2017-02-17 17:33         ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2017-02-17 23:00       ` L A Walsh
2017-02-18  8:12         ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2017-02-18 16:55           ` Mark Mielke
2017-02-20  9:59             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2017-03-31 16:27               ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2118934913.869.1487344329807.JavaMail.zimbra@karlsbakk.net \
    --to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).