From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4GBiJ000607 for ; Sun, 16 May 2004 07:44:19 -0400 Received: from monkey.sneakemail.com (clean.sneakemail.com [38.136.15.35]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i4GBiD8K012343 for ; Sun, 16 May 2004 07:44:14 -0400 Message-ID: <22463-19176@sneakemail.com> Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 13:44:06 +0200 From: "Peter Valdemar Morch" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] /boot on lvm? References: <40A72846.5050801@mlug.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <40A72846.5050801@mlug.missouri.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Running RH9 with /root on LVM gave me no end of headaches when upgrading=20 to 2.6 kernels. Primarily because I had to make a initrd RAM disk image. So now it works fine. But next time I set up my own box, I'll make sure=20 that at least /boot and /root are no-frills partitions. Peter Michael mogmios-at-mlug.missouri.edu |Lists| wrote: > Is it okay to put everything, including /boot and other critical Linux=20 > files on an LVM drive? How about swap space? > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ --=20 Peter Valdemar M=EF=BF=BDrch http://www.XXXXXXXXX