* [linux-lvm] LVM - Grundlagen
@ 2000-03-15 10:00 Markus Schreier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Schreier @ 2000-03-15 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Hello LVM-Gurus,
i'm new to lvm and to this list. I looked through the faq but couldent
find the answer there.
I'd like to use lvm in a productive enviroment. (so i would need a 2.2.x
- Kernel)
I could not find the combination of lvm-version and kernel which works
satisfying, so i would need your help.
Following some questions:
Which is the preferd lvm-version to use?
Which kernel should be used along with that?
are there any patches recomended?
Is there any draw-backs in this combination or anything to know about?
I tried arround with kernel 2.2.13. and lvm0.8pre. Using the
lvm-commands produced coredumps in a great number.
Thanks for your suggestions
Markus
Markus Schreier
ORDIX AG
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM - Grundlagen
@ 2000-03-15 16:43 Heinz Mauelshagen
2000-03-15 20:00 ` Torsten Neumann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heinz Mauelshagen @ 2000-03-15 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm; +Cc: mge
> Hello LVM-Gurus,
> i'm new to lvm and to this list. I looked through the faq but couldent
> find the answer there.
>
> I'd like to use lvm in a productive enviroment. (so i would need a 2.2.x
> - Kernel)
> I could not find the combination of lvm-version and kernel which works
> satisfying, so i would need your help.
>
> Following some questions:
> Which is the preferd lvm-version to use?
For 2.2.x use the tarball and the corresponding patch at
<ftp://linux.msede.com/lvm/v0.8pre/> _including_ the changes mentioned in
the BUGS file.
> Which kernel should be used along with that?
Up to 2.2.14.
>
> are there any patches recomended?
Only the LVM kernel patch in the above directory in case you
don't use SuSE 6.3 which already has it in the kernel.
>
> Is there any draw-backs in this combination or anything to know about?
>
Not so far ;-{)
> I tried arround with kernel 2.2.13. and lvm0.8pre. Using the
> lvm-commands produced coredumps in a great number.
As i mentioned above: add the changes described in the BUGS file.
>
> Thanks for your suggestions
>
> Markus
>
>
> Markus Schreier
> ORDIX AG
>
Heinz
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Systemmanagement CS-TS T-Nova
Entwicklungszentrum Darmstadt
Heinz Mauelshagen Otto-Roehm-Strasse 71c
Senior Systems Engineer Postfach 10 05 41
64205 Darmstadt
mge@EZ-Darmstadt.Telekom.de Germany
+49 6151 886-425
FAX-386
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM - Grundlagen
2000-03-15 16:43 Heinz Mauelshagen
@ 2000-03-15 20:00 ` Torsten Neumann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Torsten Neumann @ 2000-03-15 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Heinz Mauelshagen <mauelsha@ez-darmstadt.telekom.de> wrote:
>>
>> Is there any draw-backs in this combination or anything to know about?
>>
> Not so far ;-{)
It seems to me that LVM breaks the install routines of JBuilder.
This routines alway reports that lvm-filesystems are completly full :(
Quick fix:
# mv /bin/df /bin/df.orig
# cat >/bin/df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 12385456 10177268 2082360 83% /
^D
# chmod 755 df
and after installation, move the original df back.
Torsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-03-15 20:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-03-15 10:00 [linux-lvm] LVM - Grundlagen Markus Schreier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-03-15 16:43 Heinz Mauelshagen
2000-03-15 20:00 ` Torsten Neumann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox