From: Ulf Bartelt <ulf@twc.de>
To: linux-lvm@msede.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] SuSE/LVM boot problem
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 14:15:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <393653F6.2D1C57B9@twc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 39355918.C2B6A94B@msede.com
Michael Marxmeier wrote:
> AFAIR someone already did something similar by hacking the partition
> table and creating an overlapping partition which just happened to
> map to the root LV.
someone == me.
It�d work if the root were the only partition but I preferred to do this
hack on /boot and /.
What do I gain?
I just refer /boot and / by the "partition aliases" in fstab and
lilo.conf and my system boots strictly conventional.
And when turning off lvm functionality becomes a must, the init.d-script
can safely switch lvm off and I�m still able to access /boot and /.
When the system crashes by eventually using wrong lvm tools, I still can
get up the essential file systems and insert the right lvm tools from
e.g. a floppy (I needed this once since 11-1999).
What do I loose?
/ and /boot appear as conventional partitions in all locations e.g. df
output. I cannot switch from partition alias to lvm addressing after the
system comes up. While not modifying the boot setup, /boot could be
mounted using the lv device, but I see no reason why this would make
sense...
Both partitions are flagged to be contiguous and <strong>I</strong> have
to remember, not to move them arround. I�d like to have a nonmoveable
flag in lvm instead...
If I�d resize or move /boot or /, I�d have to recalculate the faked
partition entries.
I have to tell the geometry of the boot drive to the kernel on booting
("append=" in lilo.conf is enough) cause the kernel guesses arround and
shows strange geometries if I do not...
As long as lvm is not launched and brought down by some kernel code like
the raid stuff, I thing this way is my favourite one...
Bye!
Ulf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-01 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-03 7:38 [linux-lvm] SuSE/LVM boot problem Michael Marxmeier
2000-05-03 16:53 ` dgould
2000-05-31 9:01 ` Andi Kleen
2000-05-31 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2000-05-31 16:18 ` Andi Kleen
2000-05-31 18:25 ` Michael Marxmeier
2000-06-01 12:15 ` Ulf Bartelt [this message]
2000-06-01 9:01 ` David Gould
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-05-04 12:18 Shaw, Marco
2000-05-03 23:50 Andreas Dilger
2000-05-04 2:28 ` dgould
2000-05-04 5:21 ` Michael Loftis
2000-05-04 2:38 ` Eric M. Hopper
2000-05-03 18:09 Andreas Dilger
2000-05-03 21:01 ` Eric M. Hopper
2000-05-02 5:20 Marco Shaw
2020-11-27 16:17 ` Michael Marxmeier
2000-05-02 18:41 ` dgould
2000-05-02 21:22 ` Jan Niehusmann
2000-05-02 22:18 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2000-05-03 10:05 ` Ulf Bartelt
2000-05-31 8:40 ` Andi Kleen
2000-05-03 0:15 ` Marco Shaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=393653F6.2D1C57B9@twc.de \
--to=ulf@twc.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox