From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bs@infologic.fr>
Message-ID: <3A6DB7B7.6B714488@infologic.fr>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:56:24 +0100
From: Benoit SERRA <bs@infologic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] New dumb question
References: <200101231647.f0NGlrO30882@webber.adilger.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

> 
> It would be a help to LVM users if you could do some simple performance
> testing with different LVM stipe sizes.  With larger stripe sizes (64kB
> or so) you will likely get better sequential read/write performance, but I
> don't think the stripe size will affect random read/write performance.
> 

Is there a ratio between stripe size and PE size ?