From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-Id: <3A766C21.173CBFDE@qis-systemhaus.de> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:24:17 +0100 From: Dirk Heinrichs Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Recommended LVM Version for 2.4.0 References: <20010129163942.L8567@srv.sistina.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com "Heinz J. Mauelshagen" wrote: > > Please go for 0.9.1 beta3 we released on 25/01/2001 and don't forget to > patch the kernel even though LVM is already included which will update it to > the actual LVM release. > In order to patch, please follow the instructions in the PATCHES/README file > of the LVM distribution. > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:03:45AM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Which version of the LVM would you recommend using in conjunction with a > > 2.4.0 kernel? From what I know, only some 0.8 intermediate release seems > > to be shipped with 2.4.0, and that release is rather old? Is there any > > newer version that seems to work well with 2.4.0? Yep, tried the 0.9.1-beta3 yesterday. vgscan of 0.9 hung completely and prevented the machine from booting (I also used devfs). Now everything seem to work. Bye... Dirk BTW: I knew LVMs before from HPUX - Good Job!!!