From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <3ADC129E.3C12373B@mpi-hd.mpg.de> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:53:34 +0200 From: Stefan Helfert MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] disk add means trouble: vgscan -- invalid i/o protocol version 5 References: <3ADB3B2A.B28AC133@mpi-hd.mpg.de> <20010416142849.B16508@sistina.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com AJ Lewis wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:34:18PM +0200, Stefan Helfert wrote: > > Dear list, > > > > I was running a stable configuration until yesterday: > > several SCSI disks with standard partitions, two IDE disks, only one IDE > > disk (Maxtor 40Gig /dev/hda) holding a LVM partition. LVM version that > > of > > SuSE 7.0, that was lvm-0.8 Build 111 from SuSE. > > > > When I added a 60 GB Maxtor IDE as primary slave, I found that vgscan > > only > > throws an "invalid i/o protocol" error. Upgrading to a SuSE 7.0 update > > lvm did not help. Upgrading to the SuSE 7.1 lvm-0.9.1_beta-3 did not > > help > > except detailing the error "... protocol version 5". > > > > When detaching the 60 GB disk, everything works again. (The 60 Gig disk > > is empty, it did not hold a partition table -- and it does not work with > > a > > partition table and some partition either.) > > Can you run vgscan w/o the 60GB disk attached? If so, that's very > odd...there may be some crud on the front of the disk that the LVM tools are > reading as metadata. I'm sorry to tell: The 40 Gig disk alone, w/o 60GB disk attached, vgscan runs. I now have moved the data with the help of another machine, and currently the 40 GB disk is primary master and the 60GB disk is primary slave -- and vgscan does not run anymore. Note that the 60GB disk is holding partitions now -- a NTFS partition and a ext2, but no LVM partition there. Ideas how to investigate ? > > If you've updated the tools, you need to upgrade the kernel as well. That's > normally why you'd get the invalid IOP protocol message. I understand. I did downgrade to LVM-0.8 again, since 0.9.1-beta3 did not run with my 2.2 kernel. Stefan