From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:47:46 -0400 From: Jeffrey B Layton Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM and DRDB Message-id: <3AE05A22.6305B727@lmco.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20010420111022.C6133@cistron.nl> <200104201031.f3KAVT05030575@webber.adilger.int> <20010420123624.F13067@cistron.nl> <20010420154246.R13067@cistron.nl> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com "Martin K. Petersen" wrote: > >>>>> "Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman writes: > > Wichert> Previously Jes Sorensen wrote: > >> For a file system that size you might want to look at XFS instead. > > Wichert> How stable is XFS compared to ext3 and reiserfs? For this > Wichert> system minimum downtime is very important.. > > I mkfs.xfs'ed the / and /home filesystems on my primary workstation on > September 7th last year. What happens with I/O loads? (I've heard that XFS dies a nasty death - but that was early this year). Thanks, Jeff Layton > > > 'nuff said... :) > > -- > Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. > mkp@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/ > SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm