linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [linux-lvm] [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
@ 2001-04-21 14:00 Ed Tomlinson
  2001-04-21 14:20 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
  2001-04-21 15:33 ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ed Tomlinson @ 2001-04-21 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-openlvm, linux-lvm, Alan Cox

Hi,

building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields:

oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o
depmod:         get_hardblocksize

ideas?

Ed Tomlinson

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [linux-lvm] Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
  2001-04-21 14:00 [linux-lvm] [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems Ed Tomlinson
@ 2001-04-21 14:20 ` Jens Axboe
  2001-04-23  8:51   ` Martin Dalecki
  2001-04-21 15:33 ` Alan Cox
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2001-04-21 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ed Tomlinson; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-openlvm, linux-lvm, Alan Cox

On Sat, Apr 21 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields:
> 
> oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o
> depmod:         get_hardblocksize
> 
> ideas?

s/get_hardblocksize/get_hardsect_size

-- 
Jens Axboe

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [linux-lvm] Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
  2001-04-21 14:00 [linux-lvm] [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems Ed Tomlinson
  2001-04-21 14:20 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
@ 2001-04-21 15:33 ` Alan Cox
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-04-21 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ed Tomlinson; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-openlvm, linux-lvm, Alan Cox

> building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields:
> 
> oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o
> depmod:         get_hardblocksize
> 
> ideas?

get_hardblock_size has been removed. Take a look at the fs parts of the
ac10->11 diff and you'll see the trivial fixup you need to add

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [linux-lvm] Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
  2001-04-21 14:20 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
@ 2001-04-23  8:51   ` Martin Dalecki
  2001-04-23 13:16     ` Jeff Chua
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Dalecki @ 2001-04-23  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Ed Tomlinson, linux-kernel, linux-openlvm, linux-lvm, Alan Cox

Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Apr 21 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields:
> >
> > oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11
> > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o
> > depmod:         get_hardblocksize
> >
> > ideas?
> 
> s/get_hardblocksize/get_hardsect_size

And don't forget to have a look whatever the get_hardblocksize == 0
check
or similar can't be killed alltogether as well....

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [linux-lvm] Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
  2001-04-23  8:51   ` Martin Dalecki
@ 2001-04-23 13:16     ` Jeff Chua
  2001-04-23 13:18       ` Martin Dalecki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Chua @ 2001-04-23 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Dalecki
  Cc: Jens Axboe, Ed Tomlinson, linux-kernel, linux-openlvm, linux-lvm,
	Alan Cox

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote:

> > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o


try this (after you have applied the patch for lvm 0.9.1_beta7) ...

Jeff
[jchua@fedex.com]

--- /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c.org  Mon Apr 23 21:11:32 2001
+++ /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c      Mon Apr 23 21:12:27 2001
@@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@
        int max_hardblocksize = 0, hardblocksize;

        for (le = 0; le < lv->lv_allocated_le; le++) {
-               hardblocksize =
get_hardblocksize(lv->lv_current_pe[le].dev);
+               hardblocksize =
get_hardsect_size(lv->lv_current_pe[le].dev);
                if (hardblocksize == 0)
                        hardblocksize = 512;
                if (hardblocksize > max_hardblocksize)
@@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@
        if (lv->lv_access & LV_SNAPSHOT) {
                for (e = 0; e < lv->lv_remap_end; e++) {
                        hardblocksize =
-                               get_hardblocksize(
+                               get_hardsect_size(

lv->lv_block_exception[e].rdev_new);
                        if (hardblocksize == 0)
                                hardblocksize = 512;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [linux-lvm] Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems
  2001-04-23 13:16     ` Jeff Chua
@ 2001-04-23 13:18       ` Martin Dalecki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Dalecki @ 2001-04-23 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Chua
  Cc: Jens Axboe, Ed Tomlinson, linux-kernel, linux-openlvm, linux-lvm,
	Alan Cox

Jeff Chua wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> 
> > > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o
> 
> try this (after you have applied the patch for lvm 0.9.1_beta7) ...
> 
> Jeff
> [jchua@fedex.com]
> 
> --- /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c.org  Mon Apr 23 21:11:32 2001
> +++ /u2/src/linux/drivers/md/lvm.c      Mon Apr 23 21:12:27 2001
> @@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@
>         int max_hardblocksize = 0, hardblocksize;
> 
>         for (le = 0; le < lv->lv_allocated_le; le++) {
> -               hardblocksize =
> get_hardblocksize(lv->lv_current_pe[le].dev);
> +               hardblocksize =
> get_hardsect_size(lv->lv_current_pe[le].dev);

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                 if (hardblocksize == 0)
>                         hardblocksize = 512;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Those above two code lines can be killed, since get_hardsect_size
is returning the default sector size of Linux (namely 512 bytes)
in case the driver didn't have a chance to set hardsect_size[] array
in time for usage (Which shouldn't happen anyway).


>                 if (hardblocksize > max_hardblocksize)
> @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@
>         if (lv->lv_access & LV_SNAPSHOT) {
>                 for (e = 0; e < lv->lv_remap_end; e++) {
>                         hardblocksize =
> -                               get_hardblocksize(
> +                               get_hardsect_size(
> 
> lv->lv_block_exception[e].rdev_new);
>                         if (hardblocksize == 0)
>                                 hardblocksize = 512;
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-23 13:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-21 14:00 [linux-lvm] [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems Ed Tomlinson
2001-04-21 14:20 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
2001-04-23  8:51   ` Martin Dalecki
2001-04-23 13:16     ` Jeff Chua
2001-04-23 13:18       ` Martin Dalecki
2001-04-21 15:33 ` Alan Cox

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).