From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <3AE3ED20.FD685CE@evision-ventures.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:51:44 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <01042110002200.00707@oscar> <20010421162003.F26732@suse.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [BUG] lvm beta7 and ac11 problems Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jens Axboe Cc: Ed Tomlinson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-openlvm@nl.linux.org, linux-lvm@sistina.com, Alan Cox Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 21 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > building a kernel with 2.4.3-ac11 and lvm beta7 + vfs_locking_patch-2.4.2 yields: > > > > oscar# depmod -ae 2.4.3-ac11 > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac11/kernel/drivers/md/lvm-mod.o > > depmod: get_hardblocksize > > > > ideas? > > s/get_hardblocksize/get_hardsect_size And don't forget to have a look whatever the get_hardblocksize == 0 check or similar can't be killed alltogether as well....