From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <3B7D7D7A.9F1B6FC2@storix.com> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:24:26 -0700 From: Devin Broce MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200108161601.tno9lh.ijc.37kbpol@augustus> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: linux-lvm digest, Vol 1 #291 - 15 msgs Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com > Gerry, I messed with patching RedHat's 7.1 kernel for few days before I just went out and got the latest stable clean source from kernel.org. Patched, compiled and installed the first time out. Much nicer all around... Devin > > > > Hello!! > > I am trying to get lvm working on redhat 7.1 with kernel > > 2.4.2-2. I down loaded the source rpm's 1) > > lvm-iop-0.9.1_beta6-1.src.rpm 2) > > lvm-iop-patchgen-0.9.1_beta6-1.src.rpm and the base rpm 3) > > lvm-base-1.1-1.i386.rpm. I did a rpm --rebuild and ran the rpm command > > and all seemed to install well with no problems. The problem I did > > discover is that there is no lvm dir. in /proc and the lvm-mod is > > nowhere to be found. I was under the impression that kernel 2.4 has lvm > > already built in. I did a insmod lvm-mod and modprobe lvm-mod and nada. > > I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong or if I should not be using > > this version of lvm and use lvm 1.0 instaed (will it work on redhat?). > > Thanks, Chris. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-lvm mailing list > > linux-lvm@sistina.com > > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html > > > > Gerry > -- > "The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne" Geoffrey Chaucer >