From: Scott P <pichelma@berbee.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM limit on PE's/size?
Date: Tue Nov 27 14:01:02 2001 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C03F0C7.DB486DAD@berbee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20011127112556.D730@lynx.no
Andreas,
Thanks so much for the insight!
Here is some ouput, it looks like we might be ok?
Please comment, if possible, thanks...
-Scott
[root@ptb3 pichelma]# /sbin/pvdisplay /dev/sdb1
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sdb1
VG Name exp300_2
PV Size 440.71 GB / NOT usable 26.75 MB [LVM: 176 KB]
PV# 2
PV Status available
Allocatable yes (but full)
Cur LV 1
PE Size (KByte) 32768
Total PE 14102
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 14102
PV UUID 1gKwp2-dotn-0WJU-5FwZ-uScI-OyMH-SHVw5F
[root@ptb3 pichelma]# /sbin/pvdisplay /dev/sdc1
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sdc1
VG Name exp300_2
PV Size 440.71 GB / NOT usable 26.75 MB [LVM: 176 KB]
PV# 1
PV Status available
Allocatable yes (but full)
Cur LV 1
PE Size (KByte) 32768
Total PE 14102
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 14102
PV UUID ciUWIf-i9OO-okne-Fs6R-fjU1-NPpr-Ml4p8L
[root@ptb3 pichelma]# /sbin/pvdata -P /dev/sdb1
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sdb1
VG Name exp300_2
PV Size 440.71 GB / NOT usable 26.75 MB [LVM: 176 KB]
PV# 2
PV Status available
Allocatable yes (but full)
Cur LV 1
PE Size (KByte) 32768
Total PE 14102
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 14102
PV UUID 1gKwp2-dotn-0WJU-5FwZ-uScI-OyMH-SHVw5F
[root@ptb3 pichelma]# /sbin/pvdata -P /dev/sdc1
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sdc1
VG Name exp300_2
PV Size 440.71 GB / NOT usable 26.75 MB [LVM: 176 KB]
PV# 1
PV Status available
Allocatable yes (but full)
Cur LV 1
PE Size (KByte) 32768
Total PE 14102
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 14102
PV UUID ciUWIf-i9OO-okne-Fs6R-fjU1-NPpr-Ml4p8L
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2001 11:34 -0600, Scott P wrote:
> > We are planning to add a 3 rd EXP300 array to out current server w/ 2
> > EXP300's in place already! We WILL surpass the 1 TB size, if possible?
>
> Depends if the driver does 32-bit block numbers with signed or unsigned
> values. The absolute maximum supported by 2.4 kernels is 2TB devices.
> I don't know if 2.2 will support > 1TB devices, but it is possible.
>
> > Linux ptb3 2.2.19 #2 SMP Tue Jul 24 11:53:29 CDT 2001 i686 unknown
> >
> > We are using:
> > lvm_0.9.1_beta7
> > reiserfsprogs-3.x.0j
>
> Get newer LVM tools, like 1.0.1, because the old ones have lots more bugs.
> Beta 7 has the PE alignment bug, so you should upgrade the tools even if
> you can't upgrade the kernel.
>
> > Here is the current filesystem and size:
> >
> > /dev/exp300_2/exp300_lv2 924160464 891307744 32852720 97% /files1
>
> > Q: Why are my logical volumes limited to 256 GB in size?
> > A: This is NO absolute limit but it depends on the physical extent size
> > you configured at volume group creation time.
>
> Check what "pvdata -P /dev/whatever" tells you about the PE size. If
> it is 16386kB, then you are limited to 1TB in size. If it is larger
> than that, you _may_ be able to go past 1TB, but you may not, depending
> on whether your drivers and kernel work properly or not.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
> http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-27 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-27 11:35 [linux-lvm] LVM limit on PE's/size? Scott P
2001-11-27 12:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-27 14:01 ` Scott P [this message]
2001-11-29 8:14 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-11-29 8:52 ` Scott P
[not found] <200111291636.fATGa3L15288@jay.phy.queensu.ca>
2001-11-29 10:38 ` Peter Skensved
2001-11-29 10:58 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C03F0C7.DB486DAD@berbee.com \
--to=pichelma@berbee.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox