* [linux-lvm] Is lvmcreate_initrd expected to work?
@ 2001-11-27 16:54 Lars Kellogg-Stedman
2001-11-28 5:49 ` Goetz Bock
2001-11-29 3:03 ` Patrick Caulfield
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lars Kellogg-Stedman @ 2001-11-27 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Now that we've solved the pressing oh-my-goodness-my-system-won't-boot
problem, I've got a few other questions.
The lvm package comes with the nifty lvmcreate_initrd command...but in
my experience it simply doesn't work. While it's especially clever
about resolving library dependencies, it seems to ignore the issue of
kernel modules.
For instance, I'm running a "reasonably" stock RedHat/SGI 7.2
installation, which means that both SCSI support and the RAID5 module
are built as drivers. This means that my initrd needs, minimally:
- scsi_mod
- sd_mod
- xor
- raid5
- lvm-mod
And unfortunately, lvmcreate_initrd doesn't pick up on any of this.
I ended up custom building an initrd around busybox, which provides a
flexible pre-boot environment, including access to a shell prompt from
within the initrd (which proved extremely useful recently). But
obviously, not everybody is going to have the time or experience to do this.
I realize that the root-on-LVM design is fairly bleeding-edge, as these
things go, but it is in the FAQ. I suppose the best solution would be
for distribution vendors such as RedHat to include LVM support in their
own dist-specific 'mkinitrd' type script.
While it would probably be easier to build a custom kernel with all the
necessary drivers built in, I'll probably stick with this solution now
since I'm fond of my initrd. What are other folks doing?
-- Lars
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] Is lvmcreate_initrd expected to work?
2001-11-27 16:54 [linux-lvm] Is lvmcreate_initrd expected to work? Lars Kellogg-Stedman
@ 2001-11-28 5:49 ` Goetz Bock
2001-11-28 15:24 ` Lars Kellogg-Stedman
2001-11-29 3:03 ` Patrick Caulfield
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Goetz Bock @ 2001-11-28 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Tue, Nov 27 '01 at 17:56, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> I ended up custom building an initrd around busybox, which provides a
> flexible pre-boot environment, including access to a shell prompt from
> within the initrd (which proved extremely useful recently). But
> obviously, not everybody is going to have the time or experience to do this.
Could you share some details about your cusrom initrd setup?
I tried to do the same, but always have problmes with
- executing a shell
- continuing boot afterwards
Thanks,
Goetz.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [linux-lvm] Is lvmcreate_initrd expected to work?
2001-11-27 16:54 [linux-lvm] Is lvmcreate_initrd expected to work? Lars Kellogg-Stedman
2001-11-28 5:49 ` Goetz Bock
@ 2001-11-29 3:03 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-11-29 8:18 ` Theo Van Dinter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Caulfield @ 2001-11-29 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 05:56:13PM -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> Now that we've solved the pressing oh-my-goodness-my-system-won't-boot
> problem, I've got a few other questions.
>
> The lvm package comes with the nifty lvmcreate_initrd command...but in
> my experience it simply doesn't work. While it's especially clever
> about resolving library dependencies, it seems to ignore the issue of
> kernel modules.
Yes it does ignore the issue of kernel modules. It's quite hard for
lvmcreate_initrd to know just which modules are needed to get the system booted,
though I suppose it's possible.
It is recommended that you build the kernel with the drivers needed to mount the
root partition compiled in, rather than as modules. I realise this goes against
the Red Hat methodology of having everything as a module.
patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] Is lvmcreate_initrd expected to work?
2001-11-29 3:03 ` Patrick Caulfield
@ 2001-11-29 8:18 ` Theo Van Dinter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Theo Van Dinter @ 2001-11-29 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:05:08AM +0000, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> Yes it does ignore the issue of kernel modules. It's quite hard for
> lvmcreate_initrd to know just which modules are needed to get the system booted,
> though I suppose it's possible.
It could do the same thing as mkinitrd does by default (approx):
- check if SCSI drivers are needed (scsi_hostadapter lines in
modules.conf), if so add them to initrd and make sure to
preload scsi_mod and sd_mod.
- check the current lvm configuration, and if any of the pv's are MD
devices, pre-load the appropriate raid[0145] module as well (can
determine via /proc/mdstat).
Alternatively, options for specifying modules would work too. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"My spleen is twice the size of a normal human spleen. This isn't
such a big deal right now, but after I'm dead ... There's going to be
a bidding war." - Dave Foley, Kids in the Hall
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-29 8:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-27 16:54 [linux-lvm] Is lvmcreate_initrd expected to work? Lars Kellogg-Stedman
2001-11-28 5:49 ` Goetz Bock
2001-11-28 15:24 ` Lars Kellogg-Stedman
2001-11-29 3:03 ` Patrick Caulfield
2001-11-29 8:18 ` Theo Van Dinter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox