From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
Joe Thornber <joe@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk>,
linux-lvm@sistina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 modifies the buffer_head struct?
Date: Thu Jul 4 00:39:02 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D23E0C7.3B30B618@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 15651.54044.557070.109158@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au
Neil Brown wrote:
>
> ...
> We just want ext3/jbd to make sure that it only calls bh2jh on
> an unlocked buffer... is that easy?
It's feasible, but a downright pita.
> Ofcourse this ceases to be an issue in 2.5 because the filesys uses
> pages or buffer_heads and the device driver uses bios.
Well, for 2.4 I'd be inclined to just add the extra field to
struct buffer_head and be done with it.
Current sizeof(buffer_head) is 96 bytes, and making that 100 would
be a nuisance, but its quite easy to shrink the buffer_head a
bit (replace b_inode with BH_inode, say...).
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-04 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-02 8:41 [linux-lvm] LVM2 modifies the buffer_head struct? Tom Walcott
2002-07-02 9:17 ` Joe Thornber
2002-07-03 5:09 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-03 5:23 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-03 7:01 ` Joe Thornber
2002-07-03 7:10 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-03 23:44 ` Neil Brown
2002-07-04 0:39 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-07-04 2:46 ` Joe Thornber
2002-07-04 2:58 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-04 3:34 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-04 3:40 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-04 3:58 ` Joe Thornber
2002-07-04 4:00 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-04 4:38 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-07 14:52 ` Joe Thornber
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-05 0:21 Mark Peloquin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D23E0C7.3B30B618@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=joe@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox