From: Chris Cox <chris_cox@stercomm.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] S.A.M.E methodology
Date: Thu Jan 8 13:16:02 2004 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FFD9E2C.2040105@stercomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1073584771.14632.20.camel@gecko.indygecko.com>
Jord Tanner wrote:
> This technique, also called RAID 1+0, is often used in database
...
While both RAID 0+1 and RAID 10 have good performance
characteristics... RAID 10 is much, much more reliable.
Good RAID 10 solutions generally are HW based RAID.
Though I have used Veritas in the past to do a RAID 10.
Not sure exactly how to perform a RAID 10 in software
with Linux. A single drive failure in 0+1 invalidates
the entire column. With RAID 10, there's the possibility
of tolerating multiple drive failures.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-08 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-08 6:03 [linux-lvm] S.A.M.E methodology Ricardo Mattia
2004-01-08 7:11 ` Luca Berra
2004-01-08 13:01 ` Jord Tanner
2004-01-08 13:16 ` Chris Cox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FFD9E2C.2040105@stercomm.com \
--to=chris_cox@stercomm.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox