From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i1K1rdi29362
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:53:39 -0500
Message-ID: <403566CA.8010907@cyberone.com.au>
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20040216133047.GA9330@suse.de> <20040217145716.GE30438@traveler.cistron.net> <20040218235243.GA30621@drinkel.cistron.nl> <20040218172622.52914567.akpm@osdl.org> <20040219021159.GE30621@drinkel.cistron.nl> <20040218182628.7eb63d57.akpm@osdl.org> <20040219101519.GG30621@drinkel.cistron.nl> <20040219101915.GJ27190@suse.de> <20040219205907.GE32263@drinkel.cistron.nl> <40353E30.6000105@cyberone.com.au> <20040219235303.GI32263@drinkel.cistron.nl> <40355F03.9030207@cyberone.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <40355F03.9030207@cyberone.com.au>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue
 depth, nr_requests)
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@redhat.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/>
Date: Thu Feb 19 20:52:02 2004
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-lvm@sistina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thornber@redhat.com


Nick Piggin wrote:

> Hi Miquel,
> Can you see if this patch helps you?
>

This patch isn't actually so good because it doesn't wake
a specific process when it gets below it's limit...