From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i2GLcUj08376 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:38:30 -0500 Received: from office.labsysgrp.com (wsip-68-14-253-125.ph.ph.cox.net [68.14.253.125]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i2GLcT4b008250 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:38:29 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by office.labsysgrp.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B3MGW-0004wZ-1v for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:38:24 -0700 Received: from office.labsysgrp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (office.lsg.internal [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18947-01 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:38:13 -0700 (MST) Received: from jeeves.kpf.internal ([192.168.170.1]) by office.labsysgrp.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B3MGL-0004wT-I3 for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:38:13 -0700 Received: from [192.168.130.55] (helo=backtobasicsmgmt.com) by jeeves.kpf.internal with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 1B3MGK-0006CA-00 for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:38:12 -0700 Message-ID: <405773C4.6090401@backtobasicsmgmt.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:38:12 -0700 From: "Kevin P. Fleming" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] [RFC][PATCH] proper DESTDIR handling for device-mapper and LVM2 References: <4051388C.3050700@backtobasicsmgmt.com> <20040312013822.C4622@homer.msp.redhat.com> <4051D6EF.9070507@backtobasicsmgmt.com> <20040316152736.A31599@homer.msp.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040316152736.A31599@homer.msp.redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > I still think it's wrong to use the version of any include file found on > the host system if there is a different version of it present in DESTDIR. > [That copes fine for people installing into an empty directory, > and AFAICT also caters for people building multiple packages with > dependencies.] OK, no problem, that wasn't a big deal for me. The most important parts of my patch you've already accepted :-)