From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i57FQc005651 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:26:38 -0400 Received: from p15141853.pureserver.info ([217.160.223.157]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i57FQWXn004726 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:26:32 -0400 Received: from [217.231.15.135] (pD9E70F87.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.231.15.135]) by p15141853.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C9D4843C7 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:27:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40C48905.80608@blocked.name> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:25:57 +0200 From: philip MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] software raid or lvm? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com hello all, i've got mobo with nforce2 and siimage3112 chipset and two sata hd. i'd like to install suse91, which doesn't support siimage chipset, so i've to use software raid or lvm. what would be better/faster? can i check speed of lvm like hd speed with hdparm? thank for tip philip