From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5ME1uu23356 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:01:56 -0400 Received: from ctg-msnexc01.staff.berbee.com (msn-office-flr2.binc.net [64.73.12.254]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5ME1kVx020428 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:01:50 -0400 Message-ID: <42B96F3E.9090402@berbee.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:01:34 -0500 From: Alan Jurgensen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM is low References: <42B6ECDB.8050100@adsis.fr> <42B95A45.1080308@adsis.fr> <42B96078.8090504@dsvr.net> <42B96CFF.9050505@adsis.fr> In-Reply-To: <42B96CFF.9050505@adsis.fr> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development , greg@adsis.fr Why dont you create a 'regular' reiserfs partition on the same server and re-try your transfer. Comparing to another server isnt really fair; too many other factors: OS level, Network, Config, Server Load, Hardware, Disks, etc. Scp isn't a good gauge of disk performance, as its bottlenecks are network and CPU (decryption). Why not try 'bonnie', a disk benchmarker. >> >> Could you try explaining "really low" some more? >> >> > I copy lots of files with scp, from an old server to this new one with > LVM. The system is unsuable during the copy, but not with a server > with standards partitions... > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Alan W. Jurgensen - Berbee Information Networks - jurgensen@berbee.com