From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fentible.pjc.net (vpn-4-3.stuttgart.redhat.com [10.32.4.3]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j9S7J9Hm015450 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:19:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4361D0EC.3050004@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:19:08 +0100 From: Patrick Caulfield MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Can LVM2 and CLVM co-exist References: <200510272317.02488.edwardam@interlix.com> In-Reply-To: <200510272317.02488.edwardam@interlix.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: edwardam@interlix.com, LVM general discussion and development Edward Muller wrote: > I have a system using LVM2 and recently setup a CORAID (www.coraid.com) > device. I'd like to use CLVM to manage the volumes on the device. But someone > mentioned that LVM2 and CLVM may be incompatible. What exactly are you trying to do? LVM2 & CLVM can't be incompatible - they are the same thing! installing the lvm2-cluster RPM doesn't replace any LVM2 components, it provides a new locking method for clustered VGs and a daemon to distribute the commands across the cluster. -- patrick