From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k11I4o129666 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:04:50 -0500 Received: from smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.79]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id k11I4mU6023311 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:04:48 -0500 Message-ID: <43E0F614.8070000@starnetworks.us> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:55:32 -0600 From: "Kevin P. Fleming" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] 'snapshot' target still experimental :-( References: <0456A130F613AD459887FF012652963F33ED09@mail7.amherst.edu> In-Reply-To: <0456A130F613AD459887FF012652963F33ED09@mail7.amherst.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Steffen Plotner wrote: > With FC4 for example I cannot remove a snapshot while the underlying > logical volume is under heavy I/O. Once all I/O stops I can remove the > snapshot. Doing a lvremove will hang. Interesting. I am using this on a Gentoo system using vanilla kernel 2.6.15.1, and my volumes don't experience 'heavy I/O' at the times I make backups, so it shouldn't be too bad. Thanks for the info :-)