From: Michael Heyse <mhk@designassembly.de>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com, bretm@boneheads.us
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM Performance effects?
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:56:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44B66D47.4000001@designassembly.de> (raw)
(sorry for disrupting the thread - copied this message from the archives)
> I have set up a file server with LVM on top of RAID 5, and seem to be
> having LVM related performance issue.
Me too.
> raid device: 118.2 MB/s
> lvm device: 49.43 MB/s
> file system: 40.83 MB/s
Have you found an answer to that problem? I couldn't find anything
helpful in the archives. Is this a general LVM on software RAID issue?
I'm measuring a similar performance degradation on my system:
plain Software RAID-5:
# hdparm -t /dev/md3
/dev/md3:
Timing buffered disk reads: 884 MB in 3.00 seconds = 294.49 MB/sec
LVM2 logical volume:
# hdparm -t /dev/data/temp
/dev/data/temp:
Timing buffered disk reads: 316 MB in 3.01 seconds = 105.15 MB/sec
I tried changing the physical extent size, but this has almost no effect.
Some short system information, I'll gladly provide more if needed:
- kernel 2.6.17
- lvm2
LVM version: 2.02.06 (2006-05-12)
Library version: 1.02.07 (2006-05-11)
Driver version: 4.5.0
- 2x dual core xeon, 3 GHz
- 6x WD360GD 36,7 GB SATA Disk
- Software RAID-5 (chunk size: 256kB)
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/md3
VG Name data
PV Size 167.45 GB / not usable 0
Allocatable yes
PE Size (KByte) 4096
Total PE 42868
Free PE 4468
Allocated PE 38400
--- Volume group ---
VG Name data
System ID
Format lvm2
Metadata Areas 1
Metadata Sequence No 11
VG Access read/write
VG Status resizable
MAX LV 0
Cur LV 6
Open LV 0
Max PV 0
Cur PV 1
Act PV 1
VG Size 167.45 GB
PE Size 4.00 MB
Total PE 42868
Alloc PE / Size 38400 / 150.00 GB
Free PE / Size 4468 / 17.45 GB
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name /dev/data/temp
VG Name data
LV Write Access read/write
LV Status available
# open 0
LV Size 10.00 GB
Current LE 2560
Segments 1
Allocation inherit
Read ahead sectors 0
Block device 253:5
Any hints are greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-13 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-13 15:56 Michael Heyse [this message]
2006-07-13 17:43 ` [linux-lvm] Re: LVM Performance effects? Lars Ellenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44B66D47.4000001@designassembly.de \
--to=mhk@designassembly.de \
--cc=bretm@boneheads.us \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).