From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k9DAEJUt016234 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:14:19 -0400 Received: from smtp002.apm-internet.net (smtp002.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.10]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id k9DAEHeh031204 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:14:17 -0400 Message-ID: <452F66EF.5010005@mogmail.net> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:14:07 +0100 From: Nick MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Using LVM snapshots for hourly backups References: <452BFBF9.3060301@overnetdata.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Sounds like it's not available in LVM but I achieve simmilar results with rsync. Take a look at this for some pointers. http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/ Nick Jonathan E Brassow wrote: > I think everyone feels the same way about the current snapshot > implementation, and there is growing momentum for change. See > "*[dm-devel] [RFC] DM Snapshot scalability - Common snap store > approach*" (Oct 9th on dm-devel). > > Certainly, any changes will take a while though. > > brassow >