From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k9KA8H8Z032531 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:08:17 -0400 Received: from mail.nethinks.com (mail.nethinks.com [212.218.64.57]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k9KA8FEt015091 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:08:16 -0400 Received: from [172.16.3.16] (fw-fd-nat-235.nethinks.com [212.218.65.235] (may be forged)) by mail.nethinks.com (8.13.6/8.12.10/) with ESMTP id k9KA9iEG028213 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:09:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4538A004.6030502@nethinks.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:08:04 +0200 From: Thomas Marmetschke MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Question about Physical volume References: <45388202.7070305@nethinks.com> <4538961F.2030902@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4538961F.2030902@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: tom@nethinks.com, LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hi, many thanks for your mail. Got Version 2.01.04-5 on debian stable. pvresize exist in the unstable tree of debian with Verson 2.02xx Is there any other chance to resize the pv without pvresize? -tom