From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l499kObP020491 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 10:46:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4641970A.8000606@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 10:40:26 +0100 From: "Bryn M. Reeves" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Can't use LVM1 VG/LVs under LVM2; LV xxx: inconsistent LE count 32 != 64 References: <4641541D.2010709@opendreams.net> In-Reply-To: <4641541D.2010709@opendreams.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Molina wrote: > > I'm having a problem getting a Debian system from Linux kernel 2.4 to > 2.6 due to LVM. On the 2.4 kernel/LVM1, the VGs and LVs work fine, > mount up, and show absolutely no sign of any problem. However, I can't > get the 2.6 kernel/LVM2 to activate the VGs at all. > > I've filed a Debian bug, which has additional information, here; > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422963 > > > > The interesting error messages under 2.6 include; > > "LV tmp: inconsistent LE count 32 != 64" > > "System ID sorrows1107837513 on /dev/sdd3 differs from > sorrows1107837515 for volume group" Hi Jesse, This sounds like: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232397 This is fixed upstream in versions from v2_02_24: - -------- /cvs/lvm2/LVM2/WHATS_NEW: revision 1.586 date: 2007/03/15 13:38:27; author: agk; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 Try to fix reading in of lvm1 striped LVs. There are two fixes other than improving variable names and updating code layout etc. The loop counter is incremented by area_len instead of area_len * stripes; the 3rd _check_stripe parameter is no longer multiplied by number of stripes. - -------- Kind regards, Bryn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGQZcK6YSQoMYUY94RAqenAKCLdOcbDCJSFqvDUwZsUx/yZXQebgCfTdXu Nwz6xK1mCHIiiPVpHp6h0Ss= =fBTO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----