From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [10.255.15.25]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5SLqQ5f008652 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:52:27 -0400 Received: from carpentier.vpsland.com (carpentier.vpsland.com [207.210.113.97]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5SLqOYE003556 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:52:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by carpentier.vpsland.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252CD1823E for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from carpentier.vpsland.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (carpentier.vpsland.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GzWhN9qBFxs7 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:52:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from soetens.vdberg.org (h8441201224.dsl.speedlinq.nl [84.41.201.224]) by carpentier.vpsland.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0141823B for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.34] (h8441201224.dsl.speedlinq.nl [84.41.201.224]) by soetens.vdberg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B059A14C1CD for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:52:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46842D81.8090501@vdberg.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:52:01 +0200 From: Richard van den Berg MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Serious problem and I don't know where to turn. References: <001201c7b9a3$4f0da2d0$ed28e870$@net> In-Reply-To: <001201c7b9a3$4f0da2d0$ed28e870$@net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030306060400020200010109" Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: LVM general discussion and development This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030306060400020200010109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit WarlockD wrote: > [root@server archive]# vgscan > > Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... > > Found duplicate PV 5Up3QCLOFKXTDA1OHoWUfMrYne4SdXmb: using /dev/sdb1 > not /dev/sda1 > How did this happen? Why is the PV magic number on /dev/sdb1 exactly the same as on /dev/sda1? > [root@server archive]# lvscan > > Found duplicate PV 5Up3QCLOFKXTDA1OHoWUfMrYne4SdXmb: using /dev/sdb1 > not /dev/sda1 > > ACTIVE '/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00' [147.00 GB] inherit > > ACTIVE '/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01' [1.94 GB] inherit > > [root@server archive]# > I looks like your lvs are up. Can't you just mount them? Sincerely, Richard van den Berg --------------030306060400020200010109 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit WarlockD wrote:

[root@server archive]# vgscan
Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while...

Found duplicate PV 5Up3QCLOFKXTDA1OHoWUfMrYne4SdXmb: using /dev/sdb1 not /dev/sda1

How did this happen? Why is the PV magic number on /dev/sdb1 exactly the same as on /dev/sda1?

[root@server archive]# lvscan

Found duplicate PV 5Up3QCLOFKXTDA1OHoWUfMrYne4SdXmb: using /dev/sdb1 not /dev/sda1

ACTIVE '/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00' [147.00 GB] inherit

ACTIVE '/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01' [1.94 GB] inherit

[root@server archive]#

I looks like your lvs are up. Can't you just mount them?

Sincerely,

Richard van den Berg

--------------030306060400020200010109--