From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [10.255.15.25]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l65Gs78t008061 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:54:08 -0400 Received: from vps.decarpentier.com (vps.decarpentier.com [208.78.99.7]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l65Gs0dc000587 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:54:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vps.decarpentier.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9FB805E5 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vps.decarpentier.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vps.decarpentier.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KkaGUeu4pQFV for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:53:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from soetens.vdberg.org (h8441201224.dsl.speedlinq.nl [84.41.201.224]) by vps.decarpentier.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA67B805E4 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:53:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.34] (h8441201224.dsl.speedlinq.nl [84.41.201.224]) by soetens.vdberg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CDB14C35F for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:53:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <468D2221.7000004@vdberg.org> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:53:53 +0200 From: Richard van den Berg MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Pvmove Cannot Be Aborted References: <20070704140438.8BE0177702@mail.futurelabusa.com> In-Reply-To: <20070704140438.8BE0177702@mail.futurelabusa.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development Jim Schatzman wrote: > So... I have learned my lesson - never use pvmove on a bad drive. Your VG and LVs are not in worse shape now (after the stuck pvmove) than they would have been if you did not attempt the pvmove, right? I guess you did not use use raid on top of or under lvm? Sincerely, Richard van den Berg