From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [10.33.0.40] (breeves.fab.redhat.com [10.33.0.40]) by pobox.fab.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6O9EukO006871 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:14:56 -0400 Message-ID: <46A5C29F.3010407@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:13:03 +0100 From: "Bryn M. Reeves" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Flexible storga: LVM setup on top of mdadm sets. Good idea or not? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Luca Berra wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:57:33PM -0400, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: >>> The main drawback to md raid1 is that it always resynchronizes >>> the *entire* partition when a disk goes offline temporarily. I also >> False. md uses bitmaps to avoid this. > > The LVM mirroring uses bitmaps. Are you sure md raid does? Since what > version? > drivers/md/md.c: - persistent bitmap code Copyright (C) 2003-2004, Paul Clements, SteelEye Technology, Inc. Cheers, Bryn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGpcKf6YSQoMYUY94RAq4JAKDJYwRqXm3ZsAqLgrhbup4/MEvNNACfauDJ GNLb7n3pHU55pe+aKXenLAw= =oj8i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----