From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [10.255.15.25]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l81Kdhu2031017 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:39:43 -0400 Received: from mail2.syneticon.net (mail.syneticon.net [213.239.212.131]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l81Kdact021962 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:39:36 -0400 Received: from postfix1.syneticon.net (postfix1.syneticon.net [192.168.112.6]) by mail2.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242D754914 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:39:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (filter1.syneticon.net [192.168.113.3]) by postfix1.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F70894E3 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:39:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postfix1.syneticon.net ([192.168.113.4]) by localhost (mx03.syneticon.net [192.168.113.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id aGhEIvkkMNYM for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:39:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.10.145] (xdsl-87-78-243-125.netcologne.de [87.78.243.125]) by postfix1.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:39:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46D9CDFD.7010800@wpkg.org> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 22:39:25 +0200 From: Tomasz Chmielewski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] "cannot allocate memory" when trying to do a snapshot? References: <46CEE6FF.1090000@wpkg.org> <46D2F715.9000308@wpkg.org> <1188231241.24432.1.camel@pc.ilinx> <46D2FAFB.7010807@wpkg.org> <1188232446.24432.3.camel@pc.ilinx> In-Reply-To: <1188232446.24432.3.camel@pc.ilinx> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Brian J. Murrell schrieb: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 18:25 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> Looks like it's here: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208172 > > Yup. That's the one my bug 191531 was dup'd to. > >> Let's see if upgrading the kernel helps... > > Let us know. It looks that it helped. However, now it's possible to create a snapshot that is no longer possible to remove... See my other thread ("how much memory does LVM need? oom-killer comes"). -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org