From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jeltz.pjc.net (vpn-6-1.fab.redhat.com [10.33.6.1]) by pobox.fab.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9H8HMJl027483 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:17:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4715C511.3050400@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:17:21 +0100 From: Patrick Caulfield MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] stupid question about lvm/lvm2/clvm References: <4715A86F.40504@ezpear.com> In-Reply-To: <4715A86F.40504@ezpear.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development Hans wrote: > Hi! > I want build cluster. I couldn't decide about which system use OCFS2 or > GFS2. > I was looking for some information about clvm. > On redhat website I found some tarball with clvm toolset but called lvm2... > Does it mean that clvm=lvm2? Or clvm is special extension to lvm2, not > identical with lvm2. The source tarball for lvm2 includes clvmd too. Enable it at compile-time time using ./configure --with-clvmd If you're using RPMs then the cluster LVM one is called lvm2-cluster > I use openfiler (installed lvm2-2.02.14). Does it include clvm ext.? > > -- Patrick