From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jeltz.pjc.net (vpn-6-1.fab.redhat.com [10.33.6.1]) by pobox.fab.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9H8JYx9027679 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:19:34 -0400 Message-ID: <4715C594.4010406@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:19:32 +0100 From: Patrick Caulfield MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] cluster LVM References: <4714C8C6.7060204@cesca.es> In-Reply-To: <4714C8C6.7060204@cesca.es> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development Jordi Prats wrote: > Hi all, > I've been googling for a while but I found nothing about the current > limitations of CLVM. Someone told me that you must use just one logical > volume for each volume group. Is that true? No, you can have as many LVs in a VG as you like. > Anyone could tell me witch are and if exists any risks of loosing data > by using CLVM given certain configuration? There's anything that it's > not safe to use, like snapshots, pvmove...? Snapshots & pvmove are not currently cluster aware. so if you need to snapshot or move a logical volume it needs to be active on only one node. If you are sharing data using a filesystem, then you must use a cluster-aware filesystem if it is to be mounted on more than one node at a time. GFS or ocfs2 are just such filesystems. -- Patrick