From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0OHL9dJ005361 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:21:09 -0500 Received: from mail2.syneticon.net (mail.syneticon.net [213.239.212.131]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0OHKZx0012621 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:20:35 -0500 Received: from postfix1.syneticon.net (postfix1.syneticon.net [192.168.112.6]) by mail2.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3317486C0 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:20:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (filter1.syneticon.net [192.168.113.3]) by postfix1.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63466931B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:20:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from postfix1.syneticon.net ([192.168.113.4]) by localhost (mx03.syneticon.net [192.168.113.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id rOGIEpFs6Ao8 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:20:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.145] (koln-4d0b0172.pool.mediaWays.net [77.11.1.114]) by postfix1.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:20:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4798C8D9.6020506@wpkg.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:20:25 +0100 From: Tomasz Chmielewski MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] is LVM cluster-aware? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Is LVM cluster-aware? Of course it's not, but... Will I loose data if I have a LVM physical volume replicated on two machines with DRBD, and I want to access two separate logical volumes on different machines? Machine_1 \ /--Logical_volume_1 DRBD-LVM2-PV / \--Logical_volume_2 Machine_2 On Machine_1 I only want to read/write to Logical_volume_1. On Machine_2 I only want to read/write to Logical_volume_2. I don't want to add/remove/rename/resize/etc. any volumes - just access them on separate machines. Perhaps the answer is: yes, you will loose your data, but I wanted to be sure ;) Are there any workarounds to that (with just two volumes it's simple - don't use LVM; but let's suppose there are many logical volumes)? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org