From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m27GbpZ6029746 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:37:51 -0500 Received: from mail2.syneticon.net (mail.syneticon.net [213.239.212.131]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m27GbIjC030421 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:37:18 -0500 Received: from postfix1.syneticon.net (postfix1.syneticon.net [192.168.112.6]) by mail2.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98ABC62FD2 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:37:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (filter1.syneticon.net [192.168.113.3]) by postfix1.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3AA937E for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:37:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from postfix1.syneticon.net ([192.168.113.4]) by localhost (mx03.syneticon.net [192.168.113.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id z7w36jWyb8Lq for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:37:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.145] (koln-4d0b7335.pool.mediaWays.net [77.11.115.53]) by postfix1.syneticon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:37:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D16F33.8050905@wpkg.org> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:37:07 +0100 From: Tomasz Chmielewski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] How to "clone" a logical volume References: <47D162C8.4040104@wpkg.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Lionel Kernux schrieb: > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I'm talking about LVM uuid...I assumed that it is stored somwhere on > the actual LV...is this not the case? If not, my problem is solved! > > So...Just to be sure: > > If I dd my source LV to my destination LV (which has alraedy been > created through lvcreate) then LVM wont care and will activate it and > all will be well? Yep, it will work just fine. You may also consider using snapshots, although it has some performance penalties involved. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org