From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
To: Tilman Vogel <tilman.vogel@gmail.com>, linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: pvresize after pvcreate changes PV size: expected?
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:46:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47cbadf5-fa07-4e9d-8bd2-9cf969777f4e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAbQbbCN-=DDSerkOoKHCHxwA9gu32HvsCezOHU4NhR0cByKpA@mail.gmail.com>
Dne 11. 01. 25 v 23:21 Tilman Vogel napsal(a):
> Hi!
>
> I just encountered the following and do not understand it. The confusing part
> is that when I run pvresize without size parameter directly after pvcreate,
> the size still seems to change even though pvcreate of course also uses the
> underlying device size just as pvresize should.
>
> I am attaching the test.sh for your reference.
>
> What am I missing?
>
Hi
You are missing that the actual size of usable count of PV extents is not
changed by a single bit.
The surrounding accounting changes with the lvm2 metadata content size accounting.
For a user of a PV it's important there is 24 free extents of 4MiB each in
this case and this gives a usable size for LVs.
Rest is either unused alignment space or space dedicated to PV header & lvm2
metadata. This space is accounted a bit differently when you create a new PV
or you work with already existing PV with already existing lvm2 metadata area.
Yeah - it might be possibly 'addressed' better and PV could be readjusted
after initial create - but it's not a bug - so it avoids 'extra' clutering
of PV header space when it's not really necessary (as unlike lvm2 metadata,
PV header space is not using any backups - so the less it's touched, the
better....)
Regards
Zdenek
PS: for small PV sizes like in this case - using smaller extent size (i.e.
256K, and reducing metadata size to i.e. 192K) may 'boost' usable space for LVs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-11 22:21 pvresize after pvcreate changes PV size: expected? Tilman Vogel
2025-01-13 13:46 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
[not found] ` <CAAbQbbDGW=Q-NBVdgKqt272VYdYdd_i7Cr8qPLJiS2moSjQMAg@mail.gmail.com>
2025-01-13 16:20 ` Fwd: " Tilman Vogel
2025-01-13 17:43 ` Stuart D Gathman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47cbadf5-fa07-4e9d-8bd2-9cf969777f4e@gmail.com \
--to=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tilman.vogel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).