From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3GExnjP011676 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:59:49 -0400 Received: from septimus.inrp.fr (septimus.inrp.fr [193.51.247.28]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3GExacL032750 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:59:36 -0400 Received: from septimus.inrp.fr (septimus.inrp.fr [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.septimus.inrp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EF0E322A for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from valerian.inrp.fr (valerian.inrp.fr [195.83.134.122]) by septimus.inrp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7659BE31D6 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valerian.inrp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646902BEAD for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from valerian.inrp.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (valerian [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20446-10 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:59:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [195.83.134.19] (SCI004.inrp.fr [195.83.134.19]) by valerian.inrp.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7460C2C0E4 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:59:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48061439.6040001@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:59:05 +0200 From: Thomas Bellembois MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] LVM snapshot - "dd" file size Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hi! I am using LVM partitions on a Debian Xen system. I use LVM snapshots to clone and backup my virtual machines. I have noticed that the ISO file created with the "dd" command it much bigger that the partition used space (actually 4.7GB for the ISO - 500MB used space). No problem if I mount the LVM snapshot and "tar" all of the data. I have googled the question and read that "dd" also copy "not used space". Why is the ISO file so big ? Is the "tar" method less safe ? Is there a better solution ? Thanks for your answers. Regards, Thomas