From: "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart@bmsi.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm2 specificiation
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:10:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <498C52F2.7050809@bmsi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498B6FF5.9010307@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 977 bytes --]
Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> It was an early design decision that every VG on a system should have a
>> different name. Departures from that won't get supported - because
>> it's so
>> simple to choose different names!
> How do you move drives around among machines then, if they have been
> created with the default names that will conflict?
SAN based snapshots are the legitimate reason to wish for multiple VGs
with the same name. However, it is simpler all around if there was an
easy way to relabel SAN snapshots before the duplicate names (and VGIDs)
cause trouble.
Apart from SAN snapshots, my rule of thumb is that local fixed drives
are always called "rootvg". All removeable, SAN, or other drives that
are likely to logically or physically move between machines get unique
VG names. In the rare event I need to mount a rootvg from a failed
machine on a working machine (has happened only once), I boot from CD to
rename it (and the unique VGIDs make this doable).
[-- Attachment #2: stuart.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 315 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn:Stuart Gathman
n:Gathman;Stuart
org:Business Management Systems, Inc
adr;dom:;;4001 Williamsburg Court;Fairfax;VA;22032
email;internet:stuart@bmsi.com
tel;work:703 591-0911
tel;fax:703 591-6154
tel;home:703 378-9641
note:AIM: SDGathman
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://bmsi.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-06 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-05 22:46 [linux-lvm] lvm2 specificiation Alasdair G Kergon
2009-02-05 23:02 ` Les Mikesell
2009-02-05 23:13 ` Vinay Srini
2009-02-06 11:08 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2009-02-06 15:10 ` Stuart D. Gathman [this message]
2009-02-06 15:26 ` [linux-lvm] " Stefan Monnier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-05 21:54 [linux-lvm] " Vinay Srini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=498C52F2.7050809@bmsi.com \
--to=stuart@bmsi.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).