From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n38DBbYE001585 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:11:37 -0400 Received: from oceanic.CalvaEDI.COM (oceanic.CalvaEDI.COM [81.252.197.184]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n38DBJBP013112 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:11:19 -0400 Received: from f.baltic (baltic.CalvaEDI.COM [192.168.6.66]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by oceanic.CalvaEDI.COM (8.11.1-20030923/8.11.1/6.31) with ESMTP id n38DBHr24921 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO) for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:11:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49DCA275.8070203@Calva.COM> Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:11:17 +0200 From: John Hughes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] Will LVM2 ever be able to do striped mirrors "raid 10"? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com if (lp->stripes > 1) { log_error("mirrors and stripes are currently " "incompatible"); return 0; } Should I just stick with mdadm for my mirroring and striping needs?