From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3A8Qcp6026265 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:26:38 -0400 Received: from oceanic.CalvaEDI.COM (oceanic.CalvaEDI.COM [81.252.197.184]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3A8QJpS011072 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:26:20 -0400 Received: from f.baltic (baltic.CalvaEDI.COM [192.168.6.66]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by oceanic.CalvaEDI.COM (8.11.1-20030923/8.11.1/6.31) with ESMTP id n3A8QFr22591 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO) for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:26:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49DF02A7.50606@Calva.COM> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:26:15 +0200 From: John Hughes MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Will LVM2 ever be able to do striped mirrors "raid 10"? References: <49DCA275.8070203@Calva.COM> In-Reply-To: <49DCA275.8070203@Calva.COM> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development John Hughes wrote: > if (lp->stripes > 1) { > log_error("mirrors and stripes are currently " > "incompatible"); > return 0; > } > > Should I just stick with mdadm for my mirroring and striping needs? So, ignoring the hijacking of this thread by people proposing hardware solutions, the answer is "nobody who knows reads this list"?