From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6M5QuRJ025591 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:26:56 -0400 Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net (eastrmmtao104.cox.net [68.230.240.46]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6M5QefD020070 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:26:40 -0400 Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090722052641.UIAQ5576.eastrmmtao104.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:26:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4A66A30F.1020906@cox.net> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:26:39 -0500 From: Ron Johnson MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Can't mount or run fdisk on an existing logical volume, help! References: <2473b43f0907211255u7c116b1er9c3483bec2472cd@mail.gmail.com> <20090721195830.GA30206@esri.com> In-Reply-To: <20090721195830.GA30206@esri.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com On 2009-07-21 14:58, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:55:50PM -0700, Adam Olsen wrote: >> This pretty much sums it up: >> >> imgserv:/storage/# lvscan >> ACTIVE '/dev/storage/storage' [3.62 TB] inherit >> imgserv:/storage/# fdisk /dev/storage/storage >> But doesn't fdisk only work on *physical* block devices? IOW, why fdisk an lv ? -- Scooty Puff, Sr The Doom-Bringer