From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.14]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n89AKr8v012219 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 06:20:53 -0400 Received: from mail1.dur1.host-h.net (mail1.dur1.host-h.net [196.7.18.227]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n89AKfb6001149 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 06:20:42 -0400 Received: from [41.204.193.43] (helo=[192.168.1.72]) by mail1.dur1.host-h.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MlKI0-0006lu-FU for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:20:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4AA78173.60209@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:20:35 +0200 From: Brent Clark MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] physical volumes limit? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hiya Ive just been reading up on LVM, and one of the questions asked / posted in the FAQ was "What is the maximum size of a single LV?". That made me think, so the question I would like to ask (google / bing was no help), is. Is there a limit of any kind for physical volumes. Kind Regards Brent Clark