From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
	[10.5.110.13])
	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP
	id n89Cn4Dq019605
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:49:04 -0400
Received: from mail1.dur1.host-h.net (mail1.dur1.host-h.net [196.7.18.227])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n89CmpGw003572
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:48:52 -0400
Received: from [41.204.193.43] (helo=[192.168.1.72])
	by mail1.dur1.host-h.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <brentgclarklist@gmail.com>) id 1MlMbR-00077x-P5
	for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:48:49 +0200
Message-ID: <4AA7A430.1020809@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:48:48 +0200
From: Brent Clark <brentgclarklist@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] physical volumes limit?
References: <4AA78173.60209@gmail.com>
	<e61979140909090502g62684a1le914deb5c14d27f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e61979140909090502g62684a1le914deb5c14d27f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>

vishesh kumar wrote:
> I think It depend on size of extent
>  
> thnks

Thanks for replying. Im looking at 15TB of data.


Regards
Brent Clark