From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from breeves.fab.redhat.com (breeves.fab.redhat.com [10.33.0.40]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4JH3GNu025850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:03:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF419C7.8050401@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 18:03:03 +0100 From: "Bryn M. Reeves" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <059801caf769$fc848350$f58d89f0$@com> <4BF40A8B.2000201@alteeve.com> <20100519162601.GA18162@us.ibm.com> <05c901caf771$a3161920$e9424b60$@com> In-Reply-To: <05c901caf771$a3161920$e9424b60$@com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Adding a disk to expand an existing logical volume Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development On 05/19/2010 05:37 PM, kevin wrote: > >> If I were you, I would not bother with partition(s). I will add the >> whole disk to LVM. > > > I intend for the entire disk to be used -- so I should just skip the fdisk > step? You can either create a partition that spans the entire disk or create the PV directly on the whole-disk device. Both approaches have their advantages; with a partition table you are less likely to run into problems with (buggy) software that assumes the disks are "unformatted" because they do not contain an MBR-format partition table and handily initialises them for you. On the other hand it's somewhat easier (at least with older tools) to get alignment constraints right when creating things on the bare disk (although you still need to make sure that the start of the data area of the PV is aligned properly if you want to get the best performance). Regards, Bryn.